So let’s just imagine for the sake of argument that someone else thought they had a better use for this land. If they’re not going to buy it from Disney…are they going to have the government take it and then give it to them at a lower price? Is this method to become common practice? Can anyone here imagine the consequences of setting this kind of precedent?
Why buy anything from anyone? Why not just argue that the person who owns it is using it improperly and therefore it must be seized and redistributed?