This might help explain the sunlight thing. (I didn’t read it but am familiar with his position on ad cœlum.)
Your scenario is possible. Is it more likely than that people would join into some sort of homeowner association to prevent situations like this though? I think not.
To the extent of his property…
Lets take the heinous out of this please…
Would you have the same issue if someone had a solar collector that deprived you of sunlight?
How about Jim decides to buy the properties surrounding your house and surrounds your house in a large fence to protect his privacy, are you going to claim you have a right to view natural events (sunset) if it were to happen on the other side of Jim’s Fence?
The Flag is on his property, period, there is no technically about it…
His property ends at his property line as does yours…
There is no such thing as Public Property, just owned, unowned and unobtainable…
It would seem that there are many anti-semitic people today.
And the state protects them.
Most of them today, even if they sadly hold onto such beliefs, probably hide inflammatory language for the fear of losing employment in a world that ostracizes such idiots. Which is amplified by Jewish groups: because it needs to be and because they know people will listen and be outraged. They would also lose business and any sort of human capital which provides a safety net in society.
In an anarchist society, they would most likely lose protection from dispute agencies. Would be unable to get insurance. Due to reputation being key to these companies wanting to cover you; and of course, the consent of these companies (and their own values) taken into consideration. Would probably not be able to continue a contract in a community that wants explicit rules on inner-community safety, values, and so forth. In a sense they would be marginalized.
You have to understand that most skinheads can barely even get jobs in the current world. Where they can sue for discrimination. In a world where no such rules exist, they will be screwed. This is why they choose white national socialism over markets. They know that mixing of races and markets ruins their cabal.
In a libertarian society, in many cases you would be able to control such actions through some sort of homeowners’ association. I would say that it’s wrong to petition the government though.
the government is evil and should be abolished.
in using ‘jew haters’ to justify ‘jew hater oppressors’ i.e. the state.
your ‘friend’ has found a way to place the blame for the necessary persistance of the state at the feet of … jews.
jews yet again are the root cause of the evils of this world.
he is an anti-semite.
good-day [8-|]
Could you please elaborate on this? How would the “some sort of homeowners association” coerce my neighbor into lowering his nazi flag?
What if the neighbor’s actions caused the value of your house to go up, because now someone is willing to pay top dollar to be neighbors with a Nazi-lover?
I think you have missed the point. The issue is not about which views my neighbor is expressing (it could be 'death to whites, blacks, gays, red-heads, tall people, libertarians, etc), but the fact that his self expression on his property a) makes me worse off because no one wants to buy a house next to him and b) is generally regarded as incredibly hurtful and offensive.
Most Certainly
Ignoring the fact that such an occurrence incredibly unlikely, what is your point?
On the issue of free speech, should a pervert be allowed to go to a public place in which there are children and whip his genitals out? Would this not warrant legitimate state intervention, even though it is self-expression and not infringing on anyone’s property rights?
I think you have missed the point. The issue is not about which views my neighbor is expressing (it could be 'death to whites, blacks, gays, red-heads, tall people, libertarians, etc), but the fact that his self expression on his property a) makes me worse off because no one wants to buy a house next to him and b) is generally regarded as incredibly hurtful and offensive.
(sorry for the double post)
I gave a joke answer, because i don’t take the question seriously. someone is rude…suck it up. the market price of your property changes for any reason. if you can anticipate it or insure against it and you want to for the cost. go to it. if you dont or you can’t, thats just life.
freedom and prosperity should not be junked just because not everyone likes what everyone else does.
Should that be allowed?
I didn’t know it was possible to speak with genitals.
How is it not infringing on anyone’s property rights? What is your definition of “public place” in an anarchic society? Why wouldn’t the owner of the “public place” make it an offense to show genitals to children?
I wonder if tomorrow your new neighbor painted in huge letters on his house “death to niggers and kikes” you would hesitate for a second to use gov’t intervention to coerce him into removing the words. I certainly would out of fear for a drop in my home’s value as well as my children seeing such words.
Daniel,
I believe exposing certain parts of your body can be considered self-expression, yes. And I am concerned about if such a thing happened tomorrow, not in a theoretical anarchic society. If I were to see a man on public property tomorrow exposing his junk to children, would it be wrong for me to get the state involved?
What if government intervention forced “niggers” to pick cotton and segregated them from the rest of society? What if government intervention forced “kikes” to abandon their homes and property, and forced them to work in labor camps? What if government intervention dropped nukes on “Japs”? What if government intervention napalmed “Viet-congs”? What if government intervention starved millions of millions in China and the Soviet Union? What if government intervention blew up “sand niggers” with surgical precision?
Then blame the state. After all, they were in charge of making sure it didn’t happen.
lol… and what if aliens come down and make word clouds in the sky over my house if there wasn’t a government around to force people to cough up the money to shoot those buggers down we all wouldn’t be in this position and live happily ever happen.
bend
now cough.
So you’re saying it is legitimate for the state to preemptively outlaw me from showing my genitals to people?
lol @ this thread.