@JJ - Good one. I guess George Ought to Help does similar:
It’s not directly anti-tax but it rebuts one of the most common arguments for taxes.
I guess the argument that really gets under my skin is the But you Drove on Roads! argument. What I really want is a George-Ought-to-Help-style refutation of that argument. OK, so the government decided to build roads and I decided to drive on them. So what? How does it follow from that that I owe taxes? And I don’t want to go the “Oh, but everything could be produced privately if we just tried it” route. I want something that makes the argument perhaps not in the strongest logical form but speaks to people’s hearts like George Ought to Help does.
Clayton -