Again, stop taking pot shots.
What do you mean by “the socialist left”? People like Chomsky? I hate him and critisize him. Furthermore, I don’t selectively target the right, I merely critisize the tendency of many libertarians to defend the right or act as if they are a part of it, and beg them to stop giving everyone the impression that this is more about anti-socialism and anti-leftism than it is about a broader principle.
I don’t ignore that, I critisize that period and that tactic. It was perhaps the biggest mistake that Rothbard ever made.
And changed his position once he discovered libertarianism, going into some very interesting and informative tirades against the conservative establishment. Where he started out is somewhat irrelevant.
Even if this is true, it is equally true for the outreach to palecons, who are not ideologically compatible with libertarianism or anarchism. It was a clear case of oppurtunism, of making use of racial and cultural tensions.
Two mistakes, and a continual attempt on your part to appeal to the authority of Rothbard. Should Rothbard be immune from libertarian criticism?
You speak as if Rothbard invented libertarianism when it predates him by about a century. You also act as if one must praise every single thing he ever did, which is silly.
Again, not only do you continue to personalize, but the claims are dubious. You don’t know what other people do in their personal lives.
Do you mean to imply that top-down organization is preferable? If so, this notion is fundamentally anti-thetical to libertarianism. You keep repeating assumed premises like this that are usually held by statists against libertarians.
Getting what done? You seem more interested in getting something done, no matter what, irrespective of precisely what it is that’s being done.
I never claimed that Rockwell is a paleocon.
That’s already been done for you over the course of many posts on many threads. You’re just willfully ignorant about it.