So…what’s the difference?
…okaaay…and? The deaths of a small bomb made from everyday kitchen supplies could obviously outweigh that of a crazed gunman. What’s your point?
I honestly fail to see what logic has to do with it. If anything, I would say it’s illogical to aggress upon people who have not aggressed on anyone else. (Which is what you are recommending.)
If there’s no difference, why does it matter? And besides…can you please tell me where all these individiuals are going to get the resources and technical knowledge to even handle radioactive material, let alone build a working nuclear bomb?
That has got to be one of the most naive and (forgive me) dumb things I’ve ever heard. That’s actually worse than: "We can’t have jet planes flying around in the sky. Just look at the news, hundreds, maybe thousands of car accidents every single day. Imagine that but with a transportation device the size (and explosiveness) of a couple dozen cars, that could crash anywhere…not just on the road.
Answers to what? I thought answers were supposed to be responses to questions. Again, I didn’t realize “areas” of a philosophy needed to have an “answer”. That doesn’t even make sense.