Nir, looks like we’re narrowed down our debate to the issue of whether or not power (force) can be treated as just another good and service in the market. My hang up is that it simply can not – that power (force) markets inevitably converge towards territorial monopolies, nomenclature notwithstanding; a proposition for which I offered logical and empirical substantiation in the Gang Wars thread.
I will quote my unanswered evidence request from that thread here:
“I want examples of free (non-monopolist) markets in power (force) – examples where two or more power (force) “service providers” (gangs, warlords, mercenaries, PDAs, states, etc.) co-exist and peacefully compete on the same territory, just like shoe providers often do.”
The lack of this evidence is daunting.