Are the masses ever going to accept libertarianism?

I am one of the pessimists.
There are a number of reasons I am getting more and more pessimist by the day (apart from age, of course).

The first reason is the entitlement mentality which is universal nowadays. There’s no other way to put it: the masses want “free stuff” and they feel like they have some God-given right to it. As all addictions this is getting very serious very quick.
The second reason is the deep-seated envy many persons have towards anyone who’s better off than themselves. This envy is often coupled with the usual sentiment “you have more money than me so you must be cheating on your taxes, exploiting your employees, destroying the environment etc”.
The third reason is how easy is to scare the masses with immaginary hobgoblins. Think about the whole “War on Terror” saga. People are still buying into the whole “they hate us for our freedoms” and believe Afghanistan and/or Iran harbor the turban-wearing equivalent of Fu Manchu. They buy even more that “speculators” and “tax evaders” are the cause of all our problems.
The fourth reason is some sort of childish belief in State authority as a panacea for all troubles. The histeria (I cannot call it another way) which surrounded the election of President Obama is only one of the most recent example. This is coupled with another similar belief that you should vote one party just to avoid the other going into power: this is particularly strong among baby boomers. The usual example “if you don’t vote for candidate X the Reds will win and turn this place into a Soviet regime”. After the election you are usually left to wonder why candidate X’s politics are usually the same as the ones proposed by the Reds if not even more left-leaning.

The only thing we can do is explain our reasons but we should be ready to accept the fact that people will never “snap out of it”. I think we should take the same approach used to cure drug addiction. Short of sending people off to rehab clinics we should warn them of the long-term risks associated with their condition. Of course most addicts won’t give a damn but when faced with the risks their own children, whose future is being mortgaged on a daily basis, many will at least listen for a few minutes.

@Brian, I think the word you’re looking for as “paleo-conservatism”. This philosophy is very close to (minarchist-)libertarianism. Conservativism today usually means “neo-conservatism”.

I was never really sure what that meant. But I just looked it up and you’re right, haha. I’ll start using that instead so people don’t get confused and I think I’m talking about neo-con.

Individual liberty is an all important value. Never was, never will be. So I doubt it.

I think Bastiat had it right when he said:

“When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law.”

I thnk because of the State controlling what people know, they have really lost their moral sense.

but you could also use classical liberal. Thats really where the ideas that resemble modern libertarian ideas come from; liberalism, not conservatism.

Politically, in history you could have been a Bourbon Democrat or a member of the ‘Old Right’ and had more or less the same libertarianish views.