Libertarianism is just a sub-set of Classical Liberalism. You might wanna focus in on that.
Yes. She cannot, with a straight face, tell you (the original poster) that classical liberalism is “just an opinion”.
Well… perhaps you didn’t articulate yourself very well in your paper. I don’t know since you’re not uploading it.
I would argue that voting with your feet is not really what libertarianism is about. The “voting with your feet” method of checking governments could even be employed by socialist theorists who want to add another check on state power. Nationalists use it all the time: “If you don’t like it then you can geeet out!”
You shouldn’t have to move off your private property for any reason. State interference is a violation of your person, and the fact that you could leave does not make things any better. After all, would you excuse a mugger if he gave you the option to leave town? Hardly.
Libertarianism is really about voting with your wallet. You should be able to change whatever other firms you patronize freely. This includes security firms. The State claims a territorial monopoly on many provisions, which has many negative consequences. This is more how a libertarian kritik would look.