Both the neo-right (republican) and left parties, the democrats, just adjust to what the people want, and their philosophy isn’t consistent with how society works, and the reason why the U.S. was at it’s best under Grover Cleveland and Thomas Jefferson and at no other time, was because they were the only Presidents that were paleo-right, for individual liberty, although Jefferson not quite to the perfect degree Grover Cleveland was.
Technically, the neo-cons in the U.S. don’t even favor different groups than the Democrats do. If they make an decision not the same as the Democrats, then it’s a neutral one.
There are 2 ways to view left and right
the first one, and the original one, says everyone is basically liberal. either you’re a fascist (social liberal, going backwards ← to the ancient ways of war and tyranny, you don’t support absolute individual liberty, you might tend to like someone to because of their race or their class; the result is that every individual gets hurt, no matter what group(s) is are protected regardless of what groups a state favors) or you’re a true liberal/paleo-liberal (classical liberal; the opposite of Clinton/Bush/Obama.)
Marx’s theory was flawed as communism is not possible without government, as people can’t automatically go around forcing every i
The 2nd way, which i reject, because the results of both the left and the neo-right turn out the same, and their group favorings may often intersect (neoright is more for state forced special treatment than the old-right which isn’t at all.)
The left uses force, and is for maximum authoritarianism, as is the neo-right. They’re both aligned with Authoritarian militias in the u.s. The Left will force you to jail, and the neo-right will force the “military” on people they view a threat. So, they both do so that they can claim that their protectors of people, by the neo-right saying they stopped someone who they made a threat; the left says they’re justifiying force/coersion to make sure that the “rich and powerful” don’t take over. To sum up that both the neo-left and the Both the IRS and the “military” are really militias, because they use force, it’s just that the left does it to people who don’t pay taxes, by sending them to jail.
I just can’t separate “economic issues” from “social” issues, so my view may be a little biased, but that’s the best i can explain it; that is, the neo-right really is what most people refer incorrectly to as “liberal” these days. Also, I believe there is no sense in saying that the neo-right supports military intervention, because Obama and Biden are just as hawkish as Bush, and Obama supported the iraq war the whole time he was in the senate or at least didn’t mind it much.
Then, for the abortion issue, the neo-republicans don’t exactly oppose abortion; Bush41 didn’t until it was demanded of him, so actually the paleo right enforces the natural rights of the unborn, although for a different reason than when the neo-right does. The left is no more anti-war than the neo-right really.
Finally, socialism, the left, actually requires military anyway. So left and the neo-right only are polar opposites other than some of the neo-cons can include enforcement of Christianity, but it doesn’t have to, where as far fewer people who call themselves Democrats and enforce christianity; in fact I don’t know any diehard obama supporters who say that they identify with the “Christian Wrong”.