You’re obviously not familiar with terrorist tragedies in the 2010s…
FaceBook page created 2 days before the bombing…
You can’t be fucking serious? You tell me if this is a troll right nao >_>
Anyways, im reading through some posts, and can’t you change the name of the page?
Speaking on Sandy Hook, Feb 27, 2013…
“they had a drill that day in the area…yet again. …Always the calling card of an inside job…”
It’s possible that the page was created for a different topic–but no content actually published–and then changed to be about the person killed (because the admin of the FB page felt like doing so).
Yeah they had a drill right before the bombing. It was confirmed by a local news channel link i found, and alex jones talked about it too.
Its just a screen in case someone gets caught planting the bomb, and then they could say its a drill.
Or…
- It is possible that the cops were tipped off and, thus, sent the bomb squad to the area to try to find the bombs. Perhaps they told people that they were conducting a drill so as to not cause a public panic just in case that the tip was wrong. However, the bombs were there and they did go off and they had not evacuated the area.
also check this out
Check the time stamp for each search entry.
If you guys have facebook: https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/537115_435501913210135_1456507340_n.jpg
Yeah someone tried to make that excuse on at least one of the Sandy Hook pages. But when there’s so many it just gets hard to deny. Occam’s razor would seem to slice your theory away with even just a little investigation and consideration.
My theory is possibly. Whether it’s likely or not, Occam has nothing to do with it.
EDIT: So you actually think that the feds did? Or, are you simply playing devil’s advocate to my devil’s advocate?
It’s possible that whomever created the slideshow did so by copying a slideshow from 5 days ago and then changed the photos and other content, but forgot to change the creation date. I’ve actually done similar things on CMS’s when creating content.
It sure is en vogue to “call” it a black flag when little to nothing is known about it. That way one can say that they had a predicitive knowledge of the establishment, blah, blah.
It is unlikely that this is a black flag.
The Boston Marathon is of world renown and covered in international media.
What can we infer?
It was likely not regional and meant to exploit the cameras.
St4 said that the devices were small and made of nails, shrapnel and a “low velocity” explosive mixture. There was no structural damage done and only a few broken windows. AKA it was an ied that anyone could make. There were several devices that did not go off (one at the JFK library). This is probably organic (i.e., not synthetic). It is too early to make a call who it is. [Don’t cells usually take credit for them? - Wouldn’t it be _____ if it was some anti-tax group. I doubt it was the IRA…today is tax day right?]
What is interesting is that the end of the St4 article it says that this was the type used by the unabomber, the olympic park bomber, and…the 7/7/05 London train bombings. Now, I’m pretty sure that teddy kazinski didn’t make bombs that were comparable to those in the london attack…how is that for potential dissimulation?
Oh yeah, I’d stay away from the timestamp FB evidence route…it reeks of two seconds of photoshop and a whole lot of self-trolling (the kind where you troll yourself).
I have a theory that much simpler that any put forth as of yet:
Missle hit sidewalk. Video footage edited to remove missle. /end
Yeah, i am not buying the facebook one.
This British guy seems to indicate that it was in fact “home grown.”
he said “…it is more than rumor, but chatter within the intelligence services that suggests that it is homegrown extremists.”
here is the evidence put forth by CTs: “The Boston Globe tweeted this morning, “Officials: There will be a controlled explosion opposite the library within one minute as part of bomb squad activities.””
That honestly sounds like you have no idea what Occam’s Razor even is.
I don’t have enough information yet. All I’m saying is that you’re having to jump through more hoops than I am.
Photoshop cannot replicate video of a live webpage. Either you’re trolling, or you’re bending over backward farther than Muff. (Or you know nothing about Photoshop and are just using it as a buzzword like the general public does anytime they want to claim something is fake…as if anything and everything can be fraudulently depicted perfectly by pimple-faced teenagers in their mom’s basement.)
I just think it is a stupid form of “evidence” and I didn’t bother looking at anything that has been posted that pertains to it. you’re so hostile!
Why
I just have little patience for people who have no idea what they’re talking about yet pontificate as if they do. Seriously you literally admitted you didn’t even look at it.
Seriously? you think that is proof of conspiracy?
hmmmm, like pontificating about deep government conspiracies based on time stamps on websites? You speak from nowhere and pretend that other’s criticism is from ignorance… you are assuming that you can judge the internal workings of a dozen intelligence agencies based on a timestamp. “Ope! They really fucked up, they made their FB dedication page before the bombs went off.. der her…amateurs.”
All I say is that the timestamp tells you nothing and jumping to the conclusion of conspiracy shows that you haven’t considered anything but the first thing you want to believe.
Do you think the CIA put that website up in some form of hubris or out of dysfunction for operation? or was it the FBI? the ATF? the DIA?
Just because one theory A has less assumptions or is simpler than theory B doesn’t mean that theory B is not true.
There’s hardly any information and yet you threw in Occam’s razor at me.