Yeah that’s pretty much it. And the fact that well, this is 'merica.
False. I quoted your entire post as it was displayed when I replied. Then you literally edited it to add at least another thousand words.
I honestly still have no idea what you are talking about homeboy. What timestamp? Surely you’re not talking about the ones from all your edits to posts I already replied to…
The post of mine that says “generous edit.” is a post that I posted…thought for a minute and erased. When I took out the paragraph I replaced it with “generous edit” it had nothing to do with you. Stop making assumptions that put you at the center of everything.
I’ve told you twice now I have no idea what timestamp you’re talking about, and I’ve asked you to clarify. I’m not sure if you’ve developed Tourette’s or if you just don’t read. Would you like to clarify what you’re talking about?
well you guys arent producing anything but angst. this kind of crap is what the communist overlords hoped for when they let us keep our forums. surely theres something more productive for both of your energies than arguing over timestamps (or the significance thereof).
This was yanked from Youtube very quickly so you will have to watch it through Facebook. Is the media complicit? This clip is pretty damning, only lasts about 30 seconds.
Bizarre. I just want to think that it’s a weird compression artifact. Most digital video compressors often eliminate things that aren’t changing from the scene. Even when the whole scene shifts due to the camera, it can encode “things in this area moved by this much”. So if somehow there were an encoding error that duplicated some of the gore over that object, it could have behaved like that, then magically disappeared when someone walked past.
Check the “replied on” homeboy, that question was directed at you. You continue to ask about a “timestamp bro”, and I’ve told you multiple times dawg I do not know what you’re referring to. So are you going to clarify?
@whoever posted that video of the disappearing blood.
Interesting. if that was doctored video then it shows how the media sensationalizes. Showing people gore and stuff has a subtle psychological effect; it is a clear grab at the emotions of anyone watching. That is priming, but for what? No one has claimed responsibility as far as I know.
I was surprised that all the gore wasn’t near as disturbing as I thought it would be, based on all the NSFL warnings people put near the links. Those of the guy with his legs blown off and just the bone and entrails hanging out I was sure would have turned my stomach. This was the most interesting part of this whole event for me.
I see the timestamp you just posted after “Ctrl+F”, yes. That can’t be the one you were talking about this whole time. What timestamp are you talking about?
My post isn’t directed at anyone in particular… I actually haven’t read the thread. The OP question is: could the government have been involved? Without getting into metaphysics, the obvious answer is “yes, of course.” I also have not investigated any evidence of foul play in this incident or the Sandy Hook incident. However, we don’t really need to get into specifics, anyway, we already know more than enough about what USG is up to, what sorts of games it is playing, how it is using carefully orchestrated disinformation techniques not only to dupe the general public but also to keep the conspiracy theorists chasing their tails. No doubt, private criminals are still out there committing acts of violence, and we have every reason to expect these incidents to become increasingly frequent what with Big Pharma driving people mad with toxic psychotrophic drugs not fit for use by any living organism and what with the increasingly redistributive nature of the American economy, which is subsidizing the worst elements of society on the backs of the productive and industrious. But USG crossed the Rubicon over a decade ago and we have entered an era of phoney-baloney news of unprecedented scale and brazenness. We long since passed the point where we should assume USG funny-business until proven otherwise. If the NWO maniacs ever run out of money or steam or their house of cards starts collapsing, at that point, I will go back and revise my presumption that they are the first suspects in any headlining violence, however indirect their involvement may be. We’re all guilty until proven innocent in their eyes, so why shouldn’t they be held guilty until proven innocent?
Well now I’m convinced you’re not talking about anything at all. If you’re not going to explain what you’re talking about I guess I can’t answer your question.
Are you aware that the current US legal system was, at trial, [originally] deliberately designed/ slanted against automatic believability of any**/**all parts of the government’s story, and any /all evidence and witnesses supporting that story, via the evidentiary requirements of the Bill of Rights?
Meaning that it is as far as the law is concerned, it is still, perfectly reasonable [although entirely politically incorrect ], pre-trial, for an individual such as yourself to strongly suspect any/all government and alleged “free press” accounts of what happened, and all of the “evidence” and witnesses used to support their claims, in this instance, as well as for any others [9/11, Sandy Hook, Aurora, etc. etc.]