I’m already packing heat for the next time one of you morons disagrees with me. <.<
Do you try to troll as hard as possible?
HAHAHAHAHA!!! This made me remember Monkey Island sword combat!!!
So, according to you and apparently some others here, anyone who is not an anarchist is morally bankrupt. You must be in a perpetual state of disgust with nearly everyone you meet.
This is a silly and unproductive attitude, which is why I continue to “troll” on the topic (and it’s fun).
Many like to exclude Mises from any condemnation – it would be a little awkward otherwise – as if he really didn’t mean some of the stuff he wrote, but others with the same views are evil and stupid.
not true. try again. maybe have a go at answering the question.
unsupported claim
i dont mind awkward. better than being a fool or a coward. which are you?
Haha reminds me a bit of Sgt Hartman.
First you’d better stop waving it like a feather-duster.
Yes. That’s because people who are not anarchists do two things simultaneously
- have an absurd political position
- advocate the use of violence against people who don’t agree with their absurd position.
you see, #2 crosses the line between what is morally good and what isn’t.
Keynes said that he was a Bolshevik at one point. Who knows how his mind worked…
Keynes was a facetous enough individual to say something like that without meaning it.
So then you don’t consider non-anarchists morally bankrupt? That’s what I thought you meant by the moral abomination (the state).
Not sure how you got there, am I a fool or coward for not condemning Mises for his statism?
Are you a douchebag or a douchebag?
im not going to answer your questions untl you answer mine.
also consider yourself warned, your self-admitted trolling won’t long be tolerated.
Oh no! You can’t even joke about trolling.
This whole forum is a giant circle-jerk troll-fest.
Ban! Ban! Ban!
you can joke about it so long as you dont do it.
if all you do is joke and not contribute i hardly think that is appropriate either.
i will temp ban you if i believe it appropriate.
Well Rooster, what do you plan to do with peaceful people who don’t want to be ruled by your state ? Kill Kill Kill them ? Or else ? Love it or leave it ? Or
?
If Mises is not condemned for statism, it’s because he supported unlimited individual secession. However, he has been criticized by people who did not realize that.
Did he? Can you post a quote from him?
It’s here, http://mises.org/liberal/ch3sec2.asp
But it’s not an explicit argument in favor of anarcho-liberalism IMO.
It seems that you overlooked the masses of individuals who advocate statism because they believe that if the government did not exist, violence would escalate.
And yet in the 20th century alone, governments have wipe out about half of what the bubonic plague did…though in Jim Powell’s book Triumph of Liberty, he makes reference to another work in which the number is 300 million.