‘It would be practicable only in a world of people who are …’ <—(no moral words allowed)
close to god? have the same name as someone from the bible? be people that you lionize? have wings? have not committed any act contrary to the 10 commandments?
Mises clearly equated anarchism with lawlessness; and with the absence of insitutions that promote social order.
you think that ancaps are for lawlessness? that institutions that promote social order have no place in ancap society?
so are you calling Mises a moron for mistaking his opponents so shockingly?
Not it’s not. It is absolutely terrible, and far worse than the NAP. First of all, in many cases you would not know if you are reducing the amount of social cooperation is society. Also, practically every criticism of utilitarianism could be refined and applied to this theory. Then there is the fact that different people have different ideas as to what constitutes an increase in “social cooperation” in society.
It is also not true that all thieves reduce the amount of social cooperation in society. Maybe I steal a painting, and the entire community cooperates together in order to return the painting to its rightful owner. In this example, the thief has increased the amount of social cooperation in society.
The usage of “angels and saints” is common in Judeo/Christian cultures. If you are unfamiliar with it then it will not make any sense.
Angels (defined) - “A person whose actions and thoughts are consistently virtuous.”
Saints (defined) - “a person of great holiness, virtue, or benevolence”
Meaningless subjective gibberish about subjective morality. It doesn’t help your (non)argument.
So are you a nihilist or a legal positivist?
not meaningless when he put them in context and then proceeded to show in a context and then set the defintion.
Dondoolee, I’m sorry but I can’t take you seriously. I’ll only say : it looks like poptech is a potential member of the stirner church.
sides of the same coin…