AC,
I can’t find the post right now. But I distinctly remember you promoting eudaimonism for the merit of it not justifying atrocities. If there is some outside moral yardstick by which you justify your moral system, wouldn’t it be more appropriate to call that yardstick itself the moral system? And isn’t that yardstick your inner sense of right and wrong?
No I promote eudaimonism because I think there is an overarching goal to everyone’s life. A subjective value which is the basis for good living.
Well eudaimonism can’t really tell us what path to take or what behavior we should exhibit [ apart from the means of achieveing such a state ]. I would look at it as eudaimonism establishes our life goals while natural law establishes how one should behavior while achieveing those goals.