From this conversation. For anyone who cares, Minarchist claims to subscribe to the NAP, but he does not subscribe to the standard version as stated by Rothbard or Block. He has his own principle that he also calls the NAP. It’s the same with aggression and other terms.
Well, I just simply don’t believe you. I am not angry, but I just don’t really find much value in engaging you on these subjects anymore. I have numerous times demonstrated how one can reason to these other principles from the golden rule. The fact of the matter is that you do not accept the golden rule as your premise. But that doesn’t change the fact that estoppel, for example, comes from the ethic of reciprocity. I mean, come on, its very history comes from the common law concept of equity, and it doesn’t get much more reciprocal than that.
So, you’ve gotten me to respond to you again, but fortunately I haven’t actually engaged you in any meaningful debate in this post, so your antics will only get you so far.
I don’t believe you are acting honestly, and until you convince me otherwise, I don’t think I’m going to think otherwise. You can either care or not care what I think. If you care what I think, then I guess you’ll have to convince me that you are behaving honestly. But if you don’t care, then naturally you will stop with this nonsense.