Oh I get it. So anyone who isn’t suing in court to get their climate change beliefs legally declared a religion, or making/spreading propaganda featuring children to who aren’t motivated to go along with it being literally blown up by their teacher is “living under a rock”. Got it.
I think I’m probably more sorry to inform you that there are many world-renowned scientists (even in the field of climatology) who do not live under rocks, and nonetheless do not find “global cooling/global warming/climate change” to be a “major concern”…rather in fact, refute the claims made by expert climatologists like Al Gore and assert that the entire concept is largely a result of unfounded hysteria, political persecution, and fraud.
I’m sorry, there’s a “scientific consensus”? When did this happen? Where did all the climate scientists sign such a thing? Surely you’re not talking about the IPCC reports…
I fail to see how accepting an assertion for the sake of argument implies anything other than a hypothetical extrapolation…for the sake of argument.