government is good!

I’ve been searching for somewhere to rest my white-supremacist pro-government anti-capitalist buttocks all day! /end sarcasm./

Thats just silly.

It was seriously meant. Mount Holyoke not Holy Joke.

The Link works: http://home.mtholyoke.edu/acad/misc/profile/damy.shtml

It is in fact a real guy, however it could pass for parody. Beyond rediculous.

I think y’all have been hoaxed.

Government has been very successful in the past… Successful at destroying societies, starting wars, creating hatreds, and fulfilling it’s own desires at the expense of the people it’s claiming to be providing for and protecting.

I wonder how much love he gets from the state over this website?

a price fixed cinema ticket and a candle light dinner with hilary?

I found this site just today. it’s depressing and hilariously stupid. He seems to love ranting about the right wing.

Half the benefits they defend if not all can not even truely be argued as a benefit.

"The government has done a ‘good’ job of providing clean water’.

Heh, the government is the ONLY one who is allowed provide clean water. It’s not even a fair comparison, we aren’t even allowed a comparison! Not to mention, I can’t recall the last time a city, county, state, wasn’t in dept.

And the other half are introduced to remedy the actions of the government

(why were the poor living in bad apartments -rent control…why did we need a voting rights act…)

…is this serious, or satire?

Sadly It’s all too real.

The professor who runs the webste here http://home.mtholyoke.edu/acad/misc/profile/damy.shtml

http://www.mtholyoke.edu/news/story/5458093 - a synopsis of the Government is good website.

http://www.governmentisgood.com/about.php - the prof’s “qualifications”.

According to him :

“The criticisms of government offered by these conservatives are often at odds with much of what we know about government through research”

and as said earlier his “evidence” is anecdotal not a priori facts or anything approaching historical or scientific fact

" I have seen the damage done in my own community when taxes have been slashed and programs cut back"

Check this out:

“While government policies can sometimes threaten our freedoms, our legislatures and courts are also often the most effective avenues for defending and expanding our rights and liberties. In reality, many of the main threats to our liberties often come from the private sector.”

Is this guy for real? what Politics has he studied?

That website was possibly one of the most disturbing sites I’ve seen. I originally thought their banner read government is God and thought this kind of figures.

“I have been motivated primarily by my increasing frustration with the attacks on government being waged by those on the political right.”

Uhhh, which politicians??? They just want to grow the state!

I guess this guy is a big fan of the wars overseas and the war on drugs, etc.

Not only is this written on the academic level of a high school student, but it makes a claim that would require massive, overwhelming evidence that is not given on the follow-up. This has to be comedy, for the sake of intelligence.

I thought that they did not like “selective anecdotal evidence”.

I looked at that website just for kicks. Take a look at this 100% organic bullshit:

Conservative Criticism of Government:

Churches and charities could take the place of government in addressing many social problems.

Rebuttals:

The amount of money raised by churches and charities is not nearly enough to address wide-spread problems like poverty, hunger, lack of health care, etc. And in practice, only a small portion of the money these institutions collect actually goes to help those in need.

(~At least they don’t spend trillions of dollars bombing foreign countries!)

And this:

On the surface, it seems that charities may spend large amounts on helping the needy in our society – after all, Americans give about $240 billion to philanthropic organizations annually. But this figure is misleading. Most of the money raised by charities and non-profit organizations does not in fact go to those in need. Most of it goes to programs and facilities – like the YMCA, art museums, colleges, medical research, public television stations, churches, etc. – that primarily serve the middle and upper class people who donate the money.

(Yeah, and all the billions in government bailouts were spent healing the sick, raising the dead, casting out devils…)

Seems to me there’s probably a forgotten man in every one of these arguments.

I think this guy is enamoured with the accounting fallacy. Since he discounts the money taken, government is GOOD!

I just found this.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/anderson/anderson271.html

Anderson’s critique of this site takes the form of a biting satire.

WIN+++