Hezbollah

more on funding

http://yalibnan.com/site/archives/2008/03/analysis_hezbol.php

That is nonsense. The Shia revere the 12 original imams of old and await the return of the final imam to earth who is going to re-establish the Imamate. Hezbollah dont need to establish no Imamate, because it has been foretold the Mahdi is going to establish it when he returns to Earth with Jesus Crist. And if they wanted to, they couldnt because they don`t have the main ingredient, the final imam.

Any Sunni attempt to establish a Caliphate would be opposed since only their 12 imams were rightful bearers of that rank and therefore any Sunni Caliph would necessarily be an usurper. Their most revered martyr, the grandson of Mohammed fell at Karbala fighting the 4th Caliph precisely for being one such usurper.

why not forward your informative post on the subject to caliphate.eu by-email? it would be interesting to see their scholarly response to your analysis.

im not an expert myself on the esoteric details of exotic religious fantasies. but a little digging on wikipedia turned up this.

so it seems clerics and true believers can act as though the imam is around, they are doing things in his name and in his absence

This is not a credible source.

First the article itself makes other statements which are patentely false. "Those who rose against the Syrian occupation were mostly from the deprived and oppressed segments of civil society. And those who dared opposing Hezbollah’s domination of the country lacked the basic means of NGOs. The confrontation was totally unbalanced. Iran was pouring 400 millions of Petrodollars to roll back the Cedars Revolution while the latter was highly praised overseas but wasn’t a recipient of freedom funds."

Secondly the site is highly politicaly invested on the Empire/Saudi sponsored anti-Hezbollah side of Lebaneese politics.The site started as Web presence for the massive street demonstrations that took place after Hariri’s assassination and has evolved into a daily news site with cosmopolitan liberal democratic politics”

I concede the credibility of the source is questionable. however, there is a difference between funding facts, and opinions about which class feel one way about another. as libertarians we shouldnt offhand dismiss as uncredible any report where the unthinking statist drops in uncredible allusions to the supremacy of democracy and whatnot.

Lets scrub that article from this thread then. can you find a superior credible source that examines the relationship between hizbullah and iran?

What exactly is your point? Yes, they can find an Islamic Republic on their own. No amount of twisting is going to make an Islamic Republic into a Caliphate however, which is what you claimed. Better to admit you got them mixed up with their mortal enemies at al-Aaeda and move on.

i bow to your superior knowledge of islam. what is the difference between an islamic republic covering the world and a caliphate over the same?

Islamic Republic Covering the World? Would that be the official name of it?

You`ve obviously already figured out the difference. Islamic Republics can exist side by side and can take any size, while the Caliphate can be only one and must encompass all Muslims.

I can assure you that Hezbollah is not after an Islamic Republic covering the world, if that was the problem you can sleep easy now.

its bad enough it wants to force those in its territory to live under sharia law, what does the geographical boundary of the islamic state matter?

again, wehy debate with me when you can e-mail caliphate.eu and ask them ? you could say, ‘wehat about hte shia’. would be interesting and more fruitful than this, no?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_unity

I’m sorry I minsinterpreted the point of this thread and got melodramatic at 1:30 AM. However, the point does remain that the same could be said for the Mafia. They could be used as a model for private people to take over government sectors in the areas where they’re not aggressors.

But if the democratic party opened up a free breakfast society here in the US, I doubt anyone would find it worthy of support. And what they were doing has already been done by other private individuals hundreds of times, so they wouldn’t be worth studying.

If the democratic party started feeding the poor would you think it was out of the goodness of their hearts or in order to gain political favor? Would you think their efforts were worthy of studying?

If islamic fundementatlism is part of your spiel, it’s an an entirely different story than if your a classical liberal or libertarian. People who engage in electoral politics to impose their wacky economic of political or social views on others are in fact bad guys. Like George Bush and Barack Obama and a dozen other politicans libertarians spend most of their political time opposing.

What’s worth studying here about the US that isn’t in Hong Kong and Singapore to a much larger extent?"

You mean what does factual accuracy matter? Of course it matters. It means they aren`t going to go on a conquest from Mindanao to Andalusia.


Yeah, it`s those damn endorphins the brain produces to keep you awake. We all get that.

Well that is a splendid point then. There could be things to learn from the mafia too. In some places they do manage to be more popular than the state.

But Hezbollah isn`t really a party. They are much bigger than that. They are a giant organisation with the party only one branch of this organisation and not even the most important one.

Again, Hezbollah was born as an anti-occupation, liberation movement. If George Washington opened up a soup kitchen after the war would you give him some credit?

Society governed by Islamic law is their goal, but there are reasons to belive they would not seek to impose it via a state. One is their own statements to that effect and the other is that that would be suicide and they are not dumb.

And anyways I would say things can be learned from bad guys. Jefferson was a slave owner jet many aren`t loathe to quote him.

Common law tradition.