Do you have a job?
So your failure to articulate your position is our fault? That is a typical strategy of the keynesians. Unlike the treatises of the individualists (Human Action, Man Economy and State, Capitalism) which are accessible to the intelligent laymen, the treatises of the collectivists require a “graduate level understanding” of terrible economic theory to read at all.
Bingo!!!
You’ve figure it out Liberty Student! Advertising forces a deviation from equilibrium. In this context, it’s being corrected.
What does this even mean? Again, you have created an impregnable fortress of ambiguity.
Are you this much fun at parties?
I respectfully accept your concession.
No, it’s more of an issue with you rather than us: you are deficient with respect to your knowledge of economics.
Advertising causes the advertised to be over valued for two reasons, the cost of the advertising is added to the product, and it adds imagionary value which the consumer pays.
Of course I did. I have a job.
There is no equilibrium. It’s a fiction in your mind.
No, in this context, Google is just like Walmart. Google is collecting all of your web data from surfing, and selling it to the highest bidder. That’s why they generate new services. So they can further study and sell you.
Again, I have a job. I have been doing business with Google as an advertiser and a publisher for 6 years.
Do you have a job?
You all think economics is a closed science.
Never cheer before you know who is winning. [;)]
So you have a blogspot account?
Nope
Hurray! Google makes advertising more targeted to minimize deviation from equilibrium!
Is this more Kevin Kelly nonsense?
No, I think you’re an ignorant kook. Not quite the same. [:D]
Anything specific ? or do you just like to hurl insults when you feel inferior?
You tell it brother!
If market equilibrium were based on only real things this world would be so much more efficient!
Instead all this fiction is involved and it really mucks up the whole system.
How about the garbage with which you responded to Ladyattis? You didn’t have a single counter to anything she said, of any substance. And now just implications that we’re not up to “23rd century” thought. If anyone is hurling insults out of a sense of inferiority it’d be you, cupcake. So substantiate your statement.
Based on?