I had that same question.
It seems like the State’s law are at fault here, does it not? The non-aggression principle isn’t a loophole, but government laws tend to be.
You can’t be saying that it’s okay to have sex with a child if it were commonly accepted, are you? I don’t mean to make a conclusion from that one statement alone, but that’s what it sounded like.
You can’t be saying that it’s okay to have sex with a child if it were commonly accepted, are you?
No, I didn’t mean to suggest that. Whether it’s OK or not depends on whether someone is harmed.
Voluntarily working as a sex worker isn’t morally wrong, whether you are a child or adult. But it’s morally wrong to use the legal system as a bludgeon to destroy someone’s job simply because you find it distasteful.
“I’m extremely libertarian, so please do not piss me off with your shit”
that made me laugh
[quote=“Isaac “Izzy” Marmolejo”]
“I’m extremely libertarian, so please do not piss me off with your shit”
that made me laugh
[/quote]
Haha, thank you.
good 
What is the big deal?
Just publish the full name, address, photograph of Phillip R. Greaves along with those of his family, friends and his publisher. Freedom of speech, goes both ways.