I thought that article did a great job analyzing the whole thing. I didn’t find it using a broad brush at all. In fact Gregory seemed to take great care to point out there is no single voice:
“Although there is no single ideology uniting the movement…”
“…the website does not represent all of the protesters…”
“To be fair, some of the protesters would probably not sign on to this kind of wish list. But there are also many among them who would go even further in the state-socialist direction. In any event, any movement filled with people who want this much out of government is bound to fail in addressing what is wrong with today’s system.”
“Despite their ideological problems, however, most of these protesters have been peaceful, which brings us to the next party to the drama that we certainly cannot cheer: the police.”
Sounds pretty accurate to me. But even still, I thought it was obvious criticisms here were directed to those that subscribe to those economically illiterate demands and utopian fallacies.