No, not really because he never says “cannot” as opposed to “tend not to have”.
In fact, I remember reading somewhere that Hoppe tried to explain the difference in the next class after the homosexual student was “upset” by his remarks.
In other words, Hoppe is not a fanatic. Although I suppose people will always project their values and desires on Rothbard (Left Rothbardianism), Hoppe (Isolationism), Ron Paul (Constitutionalism). We all do it, although I try like hell not to be a fan of anyone. I want to be a fan of good ideas, not flawed individuals. I think the Rod Long crowd tends to make this mistake. They never question him, they never critique his opinions. It leads to bias and anti-intellectualism.
But if everyone was rigorous about seeing, then demanding to critique the unseen, I think we would live in a better world.
Ain’t that the truth… I would prefer a clean slate as per law is concerned, a start from scratch, it is, at this point a rediculous maze…
Attention-seeking I guess. I can’t think of any other reason why someone would be upset by the claim.
You can read the about Hoppe’s battle with the PC police at Mises…
My Battle With The Thought Police (Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus of Economics)