Nonsense. The Government of the Socialist Republic of San Lorenzo take property rights extremely seriously. If you don’t believe me, go there and climb on the phone tower of the Lorenzo State Phone Company or drive through the tall fields of the Lorenzo Department of Agriculture’s Central Farm District and see what happens to you.
Do you believe you should be free to climb people’s cell phone towers or stomp around in their fields? If so, then it’s clear that you are the one with no conception of private property.
the point i was making, was that the observation of someone applying severe violence to protect his possessions, does not prove the persons acceptance of legitimate property rights theory, and does not tell us that he has any respect for the property rights of others, just that he acts like an animal would to protect its kill.
i made this point by illustrating that your ‘proof’ if good for the paritcular somalian you have in mind, then surely it would be good for socialist collectives, good for state bureaocracies etc etc.
Tut, tut. Those uncivilized wogs. Actually defending their property.
You cannot assume that just because people will shoot you for trespassing that they do not respect the property of others. In fact, I’d say you should draw the opposite assumption. You don’t have to be a white middle class college student who’s read John Locke to appreciate the concept of private property. Even animals do. And Somalians, much as it appears to grieve you.
Yes they do. They make and enforce property lines as well.
I live on a planet that operates according to biological and physical laws rather than ideological abstractions. We call it Earth. Which planet do you live on?
How does the fact that Mises wrote Human Action demonstrate that animals don’t understand the concept of property? Or maybe it doesn’t and you realize you’ve lost this debate so you’re just trying to appear clever.
if the ‘animals’ you speak of , reason, have concepts, and are capable of udnerstanding property, and are capable of being moral, then its proper to call them Man.
Central governments have no control in many areas of Africa but I don’t see anarchists capitalizing on the opportunity by moving there. Instead, they move to highly regulated areas like Vermont or Portland to be around other white anarchists.
You’re ignoring the point: animals ARE capable of understanding property. They even mark out borders around their property and will attack you if you violate them.
I imagine you’re unable to appreciate the irony of what you wrote ? You’re ranting against ideology in a site devoted 100% to ideology ? Not to mention that your cheap materialism is just another philosophical position or ideology (one which sucks tho).
You have genes and instincts too, and one of them is what’s mine is mine and what’s yours is yours. Animals know this, even though they can’t write a book about it. So do Somalians, even though they haven’t read John Locke and will act personally to defend their property rights. I understand that sort of thing is practically outlawed in Britain, which explains why the place is turning into a socialist dump.
I get the idea a lot of people who call themselves anarchists are actually very uncomfortable with anarchy.
Then this site is seriously out of kilter, because Austrian economics is nothing less than an acceptance of biological and physical reality: man acts and resources are scarce.