The kind of insightful response we come to expect from our MVP’s.
No, not every other ideology is in favor of self-ownership and property-rights, and it’s products.
Sure they are. They are all in favor of smiles on the faces of children as well. I might as well go and start smilism, where all children must be allowed to smile.
good videos. Watch the logic of gov’t officials even give away their own house!! (Richardson). It’s obvious these individuals don’t recognize the axiom of property, so, when they try to deduce property rights their logical contradiction becomes explicit as they agree to the premises at the beginning of the interviews and then go on to contradict these agreed to premises. And to think that’s only an interview. What goes on in their mind from certain premises they adhere to when they actually sign off on legislation, etc… ! Hint: It’s not only Richardson house that is being given away.
See, even Harry Reid is a voluntaryist.
Have enough courage to call yourself an anarcho-capitalist. It might be confusing, but it’s not as meaningless as voluntaryist.
Air or an endangered species.
I would argue for clean water, but water can be controlled. However, clean water should be public good or forced into that direction.
Perhaps, you are turned off by my words of “force”, but tell me why trying to making clean water non-excluding and non-rival is a bad thing?
And then tell me why, first claim, first serve over water property is a good thing?