I don’t disagree. By calling it a homeless currency I simply mean that it hasn’t achieved primary-currency status in any national economy. That will be a watershed day, when some country abandons their own currency in favor of bitcoin because people on the streets are preferring it to their own currency. But we’re not there yet.
You may be proved correct here as well. I don’t know enough about the technical details of the implementation to say either way. I’m sure there’s a small fear that the system could have some flaw hackers could take advantage of. Only time being tested will prove it either way–hacking machines is far easier than hacking the protocol right now.
Oh I’ve gone far beyond mere seasteading, though along similar lines, take a look
(read down to my first post)
