Seriously? This is
bar·ter
[bahr-ter]
verb (used without object)
- to trade (goods, services, etc) in exchange for other goods, services, etc, rather than for money.
Nowhere in the definition of “barter” does it say the services have to be exchanged simultaneously. Your entire argument hinges on this one thing. “Well, technically they’re not bartering because one person gets their service now and the other doesn’t get it till later!”
I honestly can’t tell when you’re trolling or when you’re actually this confused.
Show me where it did.
I quote you admitting you make stuff up a lot, and I’m embarrassing myself? I suppose if I quote you admitting you are here to troll, that would mean I’m shaming myself, or something like that? I thought you would have created better material by now.
It was at least kind of rarely interesting when you seemed to at least make something that at least resembled an argument. But it’s obvious you’re not even trying now. I guess it’s easy to get lazy when everyone sees through your bs? Would you really like to be banned, as you said? I’m sure that can be arranged.