Law in "practice" in an anarcho-capitalist society

[wilderness]

@z1235

@wilderness

z1235, i know you are basically angry. I obviously can’t say that for sure, but from most of your recent posts my intuition is taking a more than wild stab at it. You haven’t been able to argue accept most recently in favor of your explicit consent that ‘initiating physical aggression is an axiom’ in that pin stand thread, which is unfortunate that you (A) would pervert what an axiom is (B) make humans out to be pure violence (C) argue for initiating coercion.

I ask why you attack my or anybody’s free-will?

Wilderness, I honestly want to understand you, but sometimes it feels (to me) like you speak a language from another planet.

I suggest asking questions, even if you private message people. If you don’t understand what other people are talking about sadly that will not help you.

@z1235

Judging by your “understanding” of my arguments and positions (above),

I didn’t judge what you said. I repeated near word for word what you have not only said recently but have been working up to. Here’s one of your last posts:

“With or without a state, there is not ONE human being that has ever lived on this planet toward whom force hasn’t been initiated. Force/aggression WILL be initiated, period. Take it as an axiom, if you prefer.”

---

maybe you use concepts you don’t understand. that doesn’t help out at all. if you don’t understand others and then don’t understand what words you are using, again, sadly that doesn’t help.

@z1235

…it seems that the situation is mutual.

How does liberty initiate physical aggression against you when the very term liberty is the contrariety or opposite of initiated coercion? How does liberty threat you?

@z1235

Sadly, we may have to consider that, perhaps, some dialogues were just not meant to be.

You are giving up in life way too easily, especially when the other person - me - is all about dialogue and wants to be on the side of justice in which initiated coercion against humans is looked down upon as something to live without and thereby to a more properous, enjoyable civil society.

peace