Fine. Oh wait. Mises ‘minimal’ and socialist state also protects the health of its subjects ?? That’s either a problem with the translation or…
I suggest you also check the chapter Liberal Foreign Policy 11. Russia
No different than the typical neocon rant.
Possibly even worse. I doubt a neocon would try to aid his case by belittling one Tolstoy and one Dostoyevsky.
I am not surprised that you, again, ignored a substantial portion of my response. Incidentally, you have yet to address my response to you in this thread.
I never said that he did not support that during atleast one point in his life.
What does “amoralist” mean?
Where did I “pretend that [Mises] didn’t say what he actually said”?
No.
Mises clearly viewed government as a collectivistic, territorial, monopolistic, bureaucratic institution which serves as the necessary prerequisite of the market economy. But he also clearly stated that, if to eradicate the collectivisticness were possible, it “would have to be done”.
I would think that this back and forth that you’re thinking about would only happen once. In order to avoid this kind of thing from happening ad infinitum, the legal companies that ruled against the other would go before an objective third party appeals court for a binding final ruling on the matter.