Please show me how I’ve insisted on needing to clarify definitions for everything.
Then you should have no problem telling me just what ontological fallacy that is.
Well that depends on the definition of “communication” you’re using.
… Not sure how I’m supposed to take this, lol.
Care to provide an example? Because the thing is, “How do you define…” isn’t an argument to me. Nor is it trying to find a convenient back-door with which to exit the argument altogether. It’s just me trying to find/figure out what a person is saying in my own terms. Why is that so hard for you to understand?
So the talk about politics have been coming up over lunch at uni ( we are about 4 in a study group), and one guys says taxes are bad, don’t want goverment to fiddle with his stuff. Yet he CAN’T understand that if you force someone to spend money on something society suffers. I think great, lets use The Broken Windows fallacy. WRONG! He says that’s just a single example and you can’t extrapolate it anywhere… Then i try to say that you have to give up something because you were forced to spend that extra money… SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO DEEEEEEEEEEENSE…
Also he thinks taxes should be replaced that when a person dies all the belongsing of that person get seized by the state to fund it… He thinks iheritance is BAD because the ones recieving it didn’t “earn it”… ./facedesk
fml…
On the other hand I did do well on my latest exam ^^ baby steps
You know what pisses me off even more than left-libertarians? My dog giving me this look, he always gives me this goddamn smirk, EVERY GODDAMN TIME, EVERY DAY, EVERY DAY, THIS RETARDED LOOK
Science and technology has made a WORLD of plenty in harmony a reality, however the dominant minority interest has created the MARKET MECHANISM OF ARTIFICIAL SCARCITY and THE WAGE SLAVERY for the abstract process of capital accumulation and concentration. If you can not comprehend these few words then your life journey is utter waste and distortion
Buzz - you should post that on Reddit. They would love it. If not, do I have permission to post it there? Not that I believe that permission is some legal necessity, but I will not post it if you do not want me to, out of respect.
Example: “IMHO being a “libertarian” means ignoring problems that destroy your neighbor until they affect you. So you can’t learn much from any problem solving organization.” and “Liberty is the word right wingers use for a concept that in simplest terms means that businesses can get away with anything.”
Where are they getting this stuff? Is it because of the so-called “Tea Party libertarianism” featured in the mainstream media? I hardly read or watch mainstream news so I don’t know. Though my dad, who does follow the news nonstop, said something interesting the other day. I told him how Ron Paul’s nickname is “Dr. No.” My dad asked if it was because he always votes “no” on spending increases, etc. When I told him yes, he said, “But, I thought that was the Tea Partiers.” /facepalm
