Be right. You have no idea how huge an advantage that is.
I’m not just being cheeky… I think you can win any debate with average debating skill so long as you have the right arguments. “Average” means that you understand your opponent 100%, don’t drop any issues, and weigh all the arguments.
I would argue that the point of any public debate is to inform the public not to convert your interlocutor :). In private debates without any observers I agree with you though.
Schiff’s performance was fine. The problem is that he’s debating clueless leftists that don’t understand inflation, wages (which are determined by productivity at the margin), prices, or the concept of warranted investment. If the government needs to spend trillions in order to stimulate “green investments” then it’s simply not warranted, by definition. There’s only so much you can do, with a limited amount of time, when dealing with idiots whose solution for everything is “tax the rich!” (the top 1% pay 40% of the nations taxes).
“They (the banks) are sitting on oodles of money that they don’t want to share.”