It seems like we have a lot of demand for Hazlitt’s work, so I think that’s a given (shall I create a thread for it?)
I’d like to see opinions of Mises’s various epistemological works before I create a thread on that. I’d be open to Theory and History too, but that’s long as well. We’ll see how it goes
Edit: Okay, UFoES it is. Would it be redundant to couple it with Hoppe’s Economic Science and the Austrian Method?
Not necessarily. Hoppe, in that work, states that Mises hinted that the basis of Epistemology is Praxeological and doesn’t fully develop it. In that brief work (90 pages), Hoppe expands on this. In other words, I think that, based on what Hoppe says in his work, Economic Science and the Austrian Method is a great supplement for The Ultimate Foundations of Economic Science.
I’d like to see opinions of Mises’s various epistemological works before I create a thread on that. I’d be open to Theory and History too, but that’s long as well. We’ll see how it goes
It sounds like “Ultimate Foundations” would be the better of the two according to Ari - never read it, but if what he said is true, that would be the better epistemological works to discuss.
Theory and History is what I call one of Mises “Big 4” - and probably my fav read of them - though, as you pointed out it may be too big of a work for a form discssion group.
Either way, if you do any Mises discussions I’m game - let me know
I’d love to have a reading group about America’s great depression. I read parts of it back in the day, but I didn’t really understand it back then so I’d like to have another go.
I’ve read How an Economy Grows and Why it Crashes. I thought it was good book and wouldn’t mind joining a discussion on it.
As for other books that I would be interested in reading, I am afraid I haven’t read very many, so I wouldn’t know where to start. Of course if there is a reading group starting up on a good entry-level book I wouldn’t mind joining.