Since any aggressive action is an externality(altering of property without exchange), it contains aggression. And due to externalities being non-economic, they are to be condemned from an economic viewpoint. As such there is no economic justification for punishment of crime because any contrary opin…

That’s what I thought you meant at first, which is why I “suggested” your post. Then Marko’s response made me wonder if I read too much of my thoughts into your post and misread what you said. Glad you cleared it up and it appears that what I originally thought you had said is true. Good post z1235…

Externalities as altering of effective property rights outside exchange,do not happen with every action, only with criminal(aggressive) action. It is a good for the person who is purchasing, but to the person that is at the receiving end of the stick it is an aggressive action, a not mutually agr…

Justice rejects property rights by its own action(punishment), Uh, criminal action rejects property rights and justice seeks to restore them. I didn’t waste my time reading this thread, but the idea that libertarians are, or ought to be, pacifists is one of the most ridiculous arguments I have ev…

Enforcing justice only looks like a loss when you look at a given point in time. If you look to the future you will see that often enforcing justice will create gains (very large ones at that). If everytime someone steals from me I fight back and reclaim what I lost I will probably spend more than I…

No different than argument for justifying state. In the value free spectrum, it does not make a difference whose property rights are infringed.. a criminals, or a citizens. Justice is no different from criminal action, if we avoid getting morals involved in it. It is both infringement of property…

Justice is no different from criminal action, if we avoid getting morals involved in it. It is both infringement of property rights. Justice and criminal action both involve the use of force. They differ in that the former is justified and the latter isn’t. On why this is true, read Hoppe here . …

are you wrapped up in paradox because you are trying to find a political system compatible with a value-neutral stance? Moderate, plumbline libertarianism qua ideology differs from all other political philosophies in that it is concomitant to libertarianism qua legal philosophy. With all others, …

Didnt read the whole thing but the large font paragraphs used a concept of a “right” which is not value free and he seemed to point at argumentation ethics in his other quote and we know about the fallacy of that.. Also no mention of proportionality was in the article.. im curious as to how such a …

Didnt read the whole thing but the large font paragraphs used a concept of a “right” which is not value free Incorrect. Read about Reinach’s Apriorische Rechtslehre here . and he seemed to point at argumentation ethics in his other quote and we know about the fallacy of that.. If you say so…

Pacifism - Only political system compatible with AE

Economics Economics Questions

nirgrahamUK June 8, 2010, 1:36pm 19

are you wrapped up in paradox because you are trying to find a political system compatible with a value-neutral stance?

Would child neglect be punishable in an Ancap society?

Topic		Replies	Views
Non violent crimes Political Theory	27	4210	July 26, 2011
Pacifism vs Libertarianism General	15	2968	August 19, 2010
Idealism and Ideologies are dangerous Political Theory	93	9995	August 2, 2009
Why I don't believe in the non-aggression principle. Political Theory anarcho-capitalism , nap , morality , ethics , milton-friedman	70	25968	March 5, 2013
To should or not to should Political Theory	10	2369	October 13, 2012

Pacifism - Only political system compatible with AE

Related topics