Question about private rights enforcement policies: coercion?

I’m going back to just economics. Libertarianism the philosophy seems seriously flawed in too many areas for me to take it seriously. Sorry.

Value is subjective.

Well where exactly do you think it seems seriously flawed? And why?

So then it’s entirely possible for a person to believe that there are no benefits whatsoever to freedom and/or capitalism, right?

I’ve already given up on it. I don’t want to get into it, hence me not responding to your question the two times you asked it before this last time.

Right, so I gotta convince them that there are benefits. I don’t want to try to convince them that there’s a “voluntary alternative,” or that it’s okay to not feed your kid until it dies if you don’t like him or that you should “turf” your family.

Why don’t you want to get into it? What are you afraid of?

How do you plan on convincing them that there are benefits? What are you talking about with “I don’t want to try to convince them that […] it’s okay to not feed your kid until it dies if you don’t like him or that you should ‘turf’ your family”?

Because there are other things I want to do instead.

Not being able to do the things I value higher.

Like what?

How would me continuing to respond to you in this thread render you unable to do the things that you (may) value higher?