Boettke doesn’t say there is something wrong with Rothbard’s description, unlike Student who didn’t understand it.
I didn’t want to get into this argument again, since I stated my case very clearly already in another thread. Only because I saw someone write here that “Student had some critique of Rothbard’s AGD where he said he’s inconsistent”, as if Student has something of value to say on this topic, did I reply to Studen’t last post over there, explaining in the simplest possible language why he is mistaken, and how he misunderstood both Rothbard and Boettke.
Here it is: https://forum.freecapitalists.org/t/why-was-krugmans-atbc-criticism-supposedly-so-insightful/25878/20
Moral of the story: It does not suffice to read a lot of books. One has to understand them.
Bottom line: If you like Rothbard’s stye, go ahead and read his books. You will learn a lot.