This makes absolutely no sense. You call calling out a sellout “confusion”, and allege that it isn’t the actual selling out that is controversial, it’s just the fact that people didn’t blindly go along with it that made it so.
Rand Paul freely admitted he wasn’t a libertarian years ago. There were just a lot of people who either didn’t notice, or assumed it was just semantics, and that he actually was part of a coalition that his father started. But evidently they were wrong.
The difference between you and them is, they recognized their mistake when it was thrown in their face. You have simply dressed it up and made excuses to justify it, and contort it so as to fit a square peg in a round hole.
Whether this is just because you’re too proud and don’t want to admit you were wrong about Rand, or can’t bring yourself to admit you were fooled, or don’t want to face the reality that there isn’t another Ron Paul ready in the wings to pick up the torch…or whether you’re just too much of a simpleton to even see what’s right in front of you, I don’t really know.
One more time, this is your guy.