Right Libertarianism

And where did Paul make his wealth? Of course he made some of it from his days as an obstetrician (sp?), but what of after it? Perhaps that nearly $200,000 a year in tax money might have something to do with that?

As far as donating to LvMI. That’s nice, but it doesn’t excuse the sleaziness of his activities. If it took lobbying for federal subsidies to bring LvMI further income, would you advocate it? What’s different about taking money from a single congressman then?

What does the college or university have to do with it?

I believe he was implying your comment was possibly “juvenille” and/or cute because you were either in a college or a university, based on the asumption that since (if you were) in college or in university, you lack experience and/or are “too young” to make valid insights.

That’s what I picked up at least.

And how did you “pick that up”?

Paul was also a coin dealer, and has been an author for 20 some odd years.

It’s hard to take your accusations seriously, since you have made public that you do it to create spice and venom.

So your theory is that a congressman should not receive pay? That Paul hasn’t done enough to distinguish himself from the pack by refusing his pension?

If you’d be so kind as to answer, I would be pleased to explain it to you.

Well gee, I dunno; you seem to be the professor of ad-hominem at the moment, perhaps you could enlighten me?

You want me to tell you, how you figured me out? And it has something to do with Ad Hominems I have been posting? Such as…?

I’m assuming you feel that this is encouraging Paul and his peddling of hardcore porn to children? [8-)]

Plus the near $200,000 a year in tax money?

I made public that I write viisciously against others to add venom; I think this accusation is a clean one.

That’s not my theory, it’s my assertion. No, Paul shouldn’t receive pay. He doesn’t produce anything.

[8-)]

Yeah, I’m not playing this game.

What? That Lew Rockwell is inexplicably infatuated with the man like a love-sick puppy? Ok…

I don’t know. It seems really out of place…

You’re right, perhaps I was just looking into it too much.

Geez, you really are an anti-capitalist.

I dunno, that hardcore porn to children comment was totally ridiculous in my opinion.

Sure he produces things. He gives a lot of people hope. He puts down an important contrarian view in the record book. He presents legislation that challenges the status quo. He builds coalitions and trains staffers, etc etc etc.

I can buy that you don’t appreciate his political views, but to paint this guy as less of a human than his associates in government, seems to be more “spice and venom”. Playing to the crowd.

Shame you won’t. There was a good lesson in it.

Of that, I’m certain. I’m not a whole lot older than you (32), and criticizing youth isn’t really my style. On the other hand, experience does mean something. It took until I was 25 to realize and start to appreciate that.

My question to Nicky had to do with who subsidizes his education (if he is getting one).

Well, yes, not to mention being anti-taxes/anti-government/anti-central planning and pro-free market.

I was saying that I find Ron Paul’s marketing scheme sleazy. I also find selling porn to children sleazy. I find both sleazy…

You forgot about the producing of sugar, spice, and everything nice. Really, he should be rewarded blood money for giving people, cough hope?

I’m sure Fidel Castro gave a lot of Cubanos hope in his day. Ignore the tortures and state-socialism.

[8-)]

Oh no, government is building the roads, I drive roads, so I’m a congressman making $200,000 a year for producing literally… nothing!

So it’s not education unless it passes a certain standard, in this case, your own? That doesn’t seem arrogant at all. I’m not a whole lot younger than you, but knowledge does mean something; last I checked, the state didn’t have a monpoly on knowledge (yet, anyway). It only took experiecing 4 years of a vaccum in High School for me (and anyone else, really) to appreciate that.

You don’t seem arrogant at all. Niccolo, if you are reading books, because god forbid, without state education you wouldn’t read or learn, please, continue reading any and all books. Even a Hardy Boys novel can do wonders in this day and age.

Too bad it’s not more. Better Ron Paul get that money that the government use it to ruin someone else’s life. (Better still if it was never taken from the people who made it in the first place, of course, but since it has been…)

Better I rob you and feed my family than some other criminal take the money for drugs if the money is going to be stolen anyways. Nice line of thinking.

I’m sorry, but the newsletter thing didn’t exactly boost my confidence of the man’s credentials; the moment anyone starts harping on RP as if he is some political saint or one “untouched” by the system, I slowly tune out such rhetorical nonsense.

Even if it looks like he’s a good guy, it’s healthy to be suspicious nonetheless, as he still works for a system that is broken (or in the case of minarchists, has all the bad people pulling the levers the wrong way), regardless of whatever his platform advocates.

I also like The Sopranos.