Neoclassical: “True or False: Ron Paul has publicly argued we should follow the Constitution.”
Are you blind? Or just wilfully ignorant?
This is quoted from the thread I suggested you read to alleviate your ignorance, which you obviously didn’t. Essentially, every single “argument” you offer I’ve already addressed in there:
Except he’s never advocated it, when compared to a voluntaryist society. So you’d be erecting a strawman. Philosophically, the question you need to ask is “Compared to what?”
COMPARED to what we have now, would you prefer a return to the size of government as outlined in the US Constitution? (Obviously leaving aside the fact that it would only grow in size again).