State monopoly capitalism

If anything, I would argue that the family utilizes economical mutual-aid, that is above mere distinctions of socialism or capitalism, since the self-interest of ensuring our biological relatives survive is it’s own reward (i.e. helping my siblings to survive ensures that I will have more biological relatives, & also increases my chances of receiving aid when I may need it).

To put it more succinctly, it could be described as an honor system that works, since there is a significant genetic pre-disposition (that is also socially & economically reinforced) in family members honoring the ability to receive & give mutual-aid.

I think it would be much harder for such to exist with non-genetically related individuals, unless of course, we are all tricked into thinking we are one big family via the collectivist doctrine of state-society, which, despite families largely being unconditional, require even more unconditional obedience (i.e. voting, coercion, war, taxation etc.) in order to sustain itself.

I think any serious proponent of the state-society realizes this, & it frankly scares the crap out of them; the possibility of individuals & crimes being accountable. The possibility of life being a harder for those who do not wish to work hard. It’s in this that is no surprise that despite living in state-society, families largely regard parasitism as an offense, even as one generation after another has a majority that unconsciouly accept parasitism as a valid doctrine.

Maybe the family resembles more to the protectionist “infant industries” theory, where dads (the state) protects the kids (industries) until the maturity age.

The family has various non-capitalistic/non-individualistic features. Marx claiming otherwise shows two things 1) he was mistaken as usual 2) the family competes with the (socialist) state thus marx saw it as ‘enemy’. And since it competes with his socialist state, it must be…capitalistic.