teh feds iz printing moneys!!1

[Inquisitor]

Both are pretty poor justifications.

Not really.

Aristotle’s scientific theory was ripped to shreds by Galileo’s gravity experiment.

Which has what to do with his methodological contributions?

In the case of Kant, the ridiculous metaphysical theories of existentialism, like what Heidegger believed, were the result of Kantian influence.

Which impacts Mises’ interpretation of Kant and overall position, how? (FYI, Heidegger was not a rationalist)

Both thinkers have been improved upon.

The logical positivists attacked rightly ridiculing it and the atom bomb gave them credibility, being that they’d managed to have such a massive breakthrough but, like Austrian economists, all that metaphysicians had achieved was rhetoric.

And yet again, what does this have to do with rationalism? BTW, the Austrians have gone a lot farther than ‘rhetoric’ (which, peculiarly, you associate with rationalism - why?)

PS: This is off-topic. If you want to continue, post any responses here: For the methodologically inclined