Value’s are subjectively decided, but can be objectively observed. No need to accuse me of what I do and do not know. I am not attacking you, and you have no need to attack me or my understanding.
For follow up on ethics/rights/morals see
When you purchase something your actions become objectively visible. People can see that you preferred the ford taurus to the honda civic, otherwise your purchasing would have been different.
I can’t tell you what you should or should not care about. Why do you assume I’m telling you what to do?
I am criticizing your moral theory but not from the standpoint of another moral theory. I’m criticizing it based on facts of reality. For example, man cannot fly and does not have wings. No moral theory need apply.
On the contrary your saying that all moral theory’s are nonesensical and you proceed to lump them into one catagory. I simply demonstrated to you how some “moral theory’s” can be practiced, and how others, such as the one you mentioned, cannot.
Your welcome to worship your birds as you see fit. In fact if it brings that much utility to you and your followers more power to you. Seems like a cheap way to be happy.
That would depend on your definition of utilitarianism. After re-reading the thread I see that there are several versions floating around and no one has bothered to clarify.
I’m sorry whats my moral theory exactly? I don’t remember telling you
Wait.. Seriously?
Please try and calm down. Try not to read too far into my posts. I get a sense that you are giving my post more credit then it deserves, and in a bad way.