Absolutely. However, the difference is due to marketing: many do not realize open-source & piracy can be free-market responses to a non-free market. This evades the important roadblock of labels, misconceptions due to mis-use of terms, lack of education in relevant fields, etc.
The organizational structure of open-source is also very flexible, & reminds one of complexity theory & how movements can operate without any one real leader, while at the same time being able to fit into the previously established model.
In the case of open-source, many companies in the pink or mainstream market utilizing open-source to cut costs, etc., mostly ignorant or uncaring to the apolitical / political ideologies of the Free Software Movement.
A more recent example, outside of the open-source movement, would be the responses to the continued existence of the W3C: as of late, many are questioning it’s continued relevance for setting web-standards (as well web-standards & practices themselves), and are considering more decentralized & less-bureaucratic (more efficient) means of developing web-standards & practices.