The Myth of Scandinavian Socialism

Ilived in England for 10 years and might as well be considered British in the sense that if I met someone from the isles and I chose they woudn’t have a clue otherwise. In addition I’ve lived in Italy and spent extensive time in Danmark, Germany and France, as well as Spain and Sweden. So there are my credentials… oh it was Chalfont St Giles Bucks if you want to know where.

Have you been to America? I hardly ever see Brits wave their flag with the exceptions of sports or when a Navy ship departs. So as for state worshipping…meh I think that word is too strong. in relation to the U.S I would say apart from Libertarians and the like, most people fall into that category, conservatives and liberals alike. The politically correct part…yes and no. I wouldn’t say its particularly worse than anywhere. It’s merely that each culture picks and chooses. e.g Violence is acceptable in U.S but not Danmark. Nudity is Visa Versa (T.V wise). So it’s not really that one is more politcally correct then the other, its just the issues.

Yes so from the above (after living in the U.S for 8 years and UK 10) I just don’t think the US is that much better in those regards. They really aren’t more freedom loving or resistant to the state. They just constantly scream it as empty rhetoric. They are just as clueless to those terms as anyone in Britain or Europe.

Yes they are more “cultured” but I have no idea why. For the Nordic countries I’m going to disagree with the God part. It’s really just a traditional cultural custom, they are not devout. However, I once discussed the issue of self ownership with my cousins and they readily stated that in part the state owned them. I think that is carried throughout all cultures…how prevelant it is…I do not know.

Binge drinking is prevalent all over Europe. People in Danmark go through that stage at about 15-19. They definetly dress smarter.

Politer…yes and no … have you been to Paris and been unable to speak French? Their arrogance is on par with Americans. The only difference is that depending upon where you are in the states, some regions tend to be friendlier.

So in conclusion I’m not saying your completely wrong, but I do think your overstating your case. And we all tend to romanticize foreign areas in relation to our own. I did that when I was in the UK. I couldnt wait to move back the US.

And then I did, and tbh I really don’t like Colorado. Or the U.S. These people are blood thirsty, morally self righteous and hypocritical its unbelievable (christianity + Warrior Democracy spreaders??? LOLZ ). They have a ridiculous zeal for the state with their flag waving, etc its no patriotism its down right nationalism. They are incredibly ignorant of foreign cultures. They live in a crazy fantasy land. I really can’t stand the foreign intervention part. At least the europeans have abandoned imperialism of the the military kind. As I said, freedom isn’t really more prevalent they just like to say Freedom! fuck yeah LIBERTY! fuck yeah but they might as well say Slavery! fuck yeah .

Everyone thinks the Liberty movement birth, home and future is the U.S but I am not so certain.

How so?

Successful at what? Rioting like the Greeks? Killing a few local politicians? Organizing into gangs? Forming a union? Attacking cops?

The Americans have 3 things that place them head and shoulders above everyone else in the competition for liberty, despite the fact that a good # of them are fat, dull and lazy.

  1. They are armed.

  2. They have a history of revolution and emancipation.

  3. They have an entrepreneurial spirit. There is a reason why the Mises Institute is in Alabama, and not Vienna.

Right. They are far more concerned with other things that state encroachment. Which is why there is an EU, and within a couple years of the NAU becoming a serious topic, the US Congress had passed legislation from Virgil Goode to put a stop to it.

I live in a parliamentary democracy. It is a bureaucratic farce masquerading as democracy. The American Republic is trending this way, but it’s not a systemic issue, it’s one of vigilance.

Europeans don’t even drink beer

They drink lager

The UK is the last bastion for beer (real ale) and it’s something we actually do well

I was talking about your hatred of gays, blacks etc

I’ve lived in the US, that’s how.

Remind me, where did capitalism originate, silly me thinking it was Europe.

Yes, thank you for repeating what I’ve already said. That said Europeans have far less of a statist mindset, moreover, the state is less prominent in their lives than in that of the average English person, I can’t say about America because I didn’t live their for too long.

Funny, I don’t remember hating blacks.

Even if it is warm.

Capitalism is man’s natural condition, so why not just ask something silly like, “Where did man originate?”

EU.

Good to know somebody is speaking about the subject who has a clue about it.

By politically correct I meant the anti racism, pro environmentalism agenda, tell a European to say “African American” and they’ll laugh. Make a racist joke and by and large they’ll laugh.

Not so for the English, they’ll look at you like you wish to burn all the jews in the world and enslave the blacks.

Well Europeans are very statist in rhetoric, in action they often show they couldn’t care less. The English are statist in rhetoric and action, moreover, they’re very self righteous about it.

Yeah, I have a Swedish friend who says the same thing. He told me that where he’s from you’re forced to register as a protestant upon being born or something like that, but few practise it.

Well, yes, I agree. Although, the mentality is different. I’d say on the continent it’s more of a matter of going out with your friends and drinking some beer as the night goes on. On the other hand the English are more keen on downing two bottles of cheap wine before going out.

What are you talking about? Capitalism originated in Europe, Italy specifically.

I made it clear.

And it doesn’t make sense, or square with the facts. I hate to break it to you but before capitalism man still existed, they were just largely self sufficient.

Whatever. You’ll have to find someone else to indulge your need for attention. This was pointless about 4 posts ago.

OK, OK, what you actually said is that you would prefer not to associate with them

Although you do have a mixed race friend

Could we keep discussion of GS’s personal preferences to PMs? They have nothing to do with this thread.

Your argument is completely one sided, ignoring the arguments I presented multiple times in this thread. Sweden does have an oppressive tax system, but they do have lower corporate income taxes and less regulations than the United States. This removes many barriers to economic growth, making living in Sweden bearable for the average person.

The problem is that nobody in a nation has the exact same goals. Even if they all agreed on greater welfare, it would not change the fact that they would experience lower economic growth than otherwise possible because of their welfare state.

I was born in Sweden and the fact that 20 % of the population is foreingborn does not mean that they are muslim. Of the 20 % half was born by European parents and the other half is designated as of non European extraction. Most of them come from the Middle East but a lfarly large protion are Christian. However they are all tribal, extremely social conservative, religious fundamentalists and/or political extremists.

Sweden has now the same problems as does the US a polarizarion is arising between the majority and the minorities. Sweden will in the next election have a xenophobic, nationalistic and semi fascist/socialdemocrat party voted into parliament, the SwedenDemocrats, SverigeDemokraterna.

I’m fascinated by, but haven’t reached any sort of conclusion in the subject of the Anglophone world’s (I mean UK, US, Canada, Australia) culture and relation to statism. One might think the Anglophone world is generally more libertarian at first glance, but digging deeper, perhaps Anglophones only have the “loudest yelps,” for liberty as was said in the American Revolution. Reading Rothbard one would be lead to believe the US was “conceived in liberty,” but reading Nock or Kuehnelt-Leddhin one might think more highly of Poland, Italy, Germanic & Norse countries etc.

Anglophone culture certainly has it’s share of beastly aspects: disgusting aesthetic sense in general, in particular- architecturally, lack of decent culinary traditions, belief in alcoholism as a desirable lifestyle, seeming inability to distinguish quantity from quality, and more-- you see a lot of this lamented by Nock and lampooned by Mencken. Whether or not this has a strong relation to statism I’m not sure.

I’m not sure if Rothbard ever compared countries culturally, or praised one above the other.

That’s true for the most part, but Rothbard did seem to have a bit of a “libertarian American exceptionalism,” if you will. What I’m saying isn’t really supposed to be about Rothbard, but libertarians in general; most libertarians do seem to view America as the cradle of liberty. Perhaps for this reason I should have avoided mentioning specific names at all.