The relationship between Praxeology and Thymology: A Restatement

Adam,

It would be really helpful for me if you could draw (or just describe) a Venn diagram showing how the different classes of action relate to one another. If the four classes of action you describe represent four different branches of praxeology, then it should not be difficult to find examples of actions which sit on one branch and not on any of the others. I don’t feel that your last response to me in the other thread addressed my question/concern, or maybe I just didn’t understand your response. I would like to hear what you consider an example of a non-catallactic action, i.e. an action not conducted on the basis of monetary calculation, an example of an action that has no effect on the market, and an example of an action which is non-physical.

Could you also give an example of an exact law which is neither 1) a law coming from general praxeology (i.e. sitting above all the branches), nor 2) comes from the branch most fully elaborated so far (i.e. catallactics)? Such as an exact law that applies to mental actions but not catallactic actions.