Are you serious?
One more time. I never said anything about “lots”. You did. You brought that up out of nowhere for no apparent reason. I said “if I own the road”. Again, you can scroll up and read it. I even spelled out this point in my last post. So one more time, I have no idea why you’re talking about lots.
So, again:
“objectively bad”.
-
Can you demonstrate there is such a thing?
-
Can you demonstrate simply driving an automobile (or some transportation device) while drunk fits into that term?
-Who declares this ban?
I suppose you could claim that your answer is “private road owners do”…but again, that’s just a ban on access to their private roads. They aren’t declaring “the act of driving drunk is now banned.” Who is making that declaration? And where does this person/group get that authority?
-Who is going to enforce this ban?
Again, if I drive drunk on my own road, obviously you can’t claim “the owner of the road will enforce the ban”. So, where exactly did you answer this question?
-Who is going to stop someone from getting in his car drunk?
where exactly did you answer this question?
-What’s going to happen to him when he does drive drunk and is caught?
where exactly did you answer this question?
-By whom?
where exactly did you answer this question?
-under what sort of justification is this unnamed source going to aggress on this drunk driver?
where exactly did you answer this question?