The entire edifice of a liberal civilization rests on the underlying culture.
People are not biologically determined to respect property, but there is an evolutionary pressure for some degree of respect for property. Property must be respected to some extent, because in the complete absence of such respect, the society in question would collapse: and be driven into extinction by competing societies. However, as history tells, it is possible for societies to sustain themselves all along the spectrum of respect for property.
What determines the degree to which a society will respect property is the culture.
What is culture? Culture is the set of all valuations and beliefs existing in society. I would divide these into two categories: ends and means. Fortunately, the vast majority of human beings have basically the same ends: peace and prosperity. A tiny minority loves violence for its own sake. People do not need to be taught these ends, and they are fairly constant over time. What is in flux are the means: i.e. the ideas about how we can best achieve our ends. AIn other words, ethics. What rules of behavior should be adopted to yield the desired results? Some small fraction of the population is capable and of and interested in reasoning out this question. Supposing their ends are peace and prosperity, they will inevitably become libertarians. But the vast majority of the population is either incapable of or uninterested in reasoning out the question of means. So they resort to magical thinking. They listen to priests who convince them on an irrational level that certain spells and rituals (e.g. communion, inflation, prayer, war) will yield them the results they desire.
There’s no possibility of making a rational libertarian out of everyone. The majority will employ magical thinking in the pursuit of their ends. What we need to do is provide them with magical thinking which brings them (unwittingly) into support of libertarian ethics.
There’s a thread about the possibility of creating a purpose-built libertarian religion ( The First Church of Mises - #7 by bloomj31). But until such time as that can be accomplished, we need to embrace aspects of existing religions which are useful for our purposes. The same for culture in general. I think a libertarian should, in his public role and whatever his personal beliefs, be a cultural conservative. The new culture being imposed now by the Left is far more hostile to liberalism than the traditional culture, and so the latter should be defended in order to halt the advance of the former - again, until such time as an originally libertarian culture can make headway.