Wealth centralization in a free-market?

Thank you. I don’t know why it was so difficult for you to explicitly concede that his example is logically valid.

If you made a mistaken assumption in your original example, why didn’t you come out and say that afterwards? You didn’t do that. Instead you countered Nirgraham’s claim by changing the context. That’s not intellectually honest, if you ask me.

You’re going to have to try a lot harder to side-step my point than this. When you refer to “an economy where goods are produced by wage labor”, are you referring to an economy where all goods are necessarily produced by wage labor, or are you referring to an economy where some goods are sometimes produced by wage labor? In other words, are you implicitly using the universal quantifier or the existential quantifier? My reaction to your phrase has been to assume that you’re implicitly using the former, but I could be wrong. Since I’m not a mind-reader, it’s up to you to clarify.

Okay, and what reasoning do you have to support that prediction? What is it based on? Quotes from Marx don’t count IMHO.

As a follower of the Austrian school of economics, I don’t think the business cycle is caused by any amount of wage labor. Whether a free market would have roughly the same amount of wage labor as present doesn’t matter to me.

Well then.

Did you or did you not previously write that capitalists don’t consume their profits?

Nirgraham’s example, which assumes capitalists consuming all of their profits, doesn’t show the problem you’ve highlighted. So in that case, how would the problem happen at a slower rate if they don’t consume all of their profits? That’s a complete contradiction. Let me remind you that you conceded earlier that Nirgraham’s example is logically valid.

That directly contradicts what Marx wrote. He wrote that exchange-value is the expression of value (average amount of socially necessary labor time) under commodity production and exchange. Value and use-value are independent of one another.

And why would that be? B only needs to be paid enough to reproduce his labor power, right?

Wealth is unconsumed production. What’s the problem with accumulating it? There is none.

Wealth turns into investment seed-money. That’s a very good thing. The US is still the cheapest and safest place to invest money. That accounts for a great deal of our economic success. Try to invest in physical capital in Africa; it will probably get stolen before you can make your money back.