Just finished reading The Leaderless Revolution by Carne Ross. The book is aimed at the mainstream audience. Ross was a British diplomat who dealt primarily in issues dealing with terrorism and the Afghan and second Iraq wars. Coming into what he thought was his dream job, he sincerly believed that government was the most effective way to solve the world’s most pressing problems. But after years on the job, he came to the conclusion that government was the problem, not the solution. Ross thus became an anarchist. He felt guilt in not doing more for easing the sanctions against Iraq during the 90s, which contributed to thousands of deaths. Ross eventually called it quits and helped formed a private non-profit diplomatic agency. Some passages from the book:
When working for government, you feel insulating against wrongdoing, because it wasn’t your choice, but the choice of your superior, you are just merely doing things the boss ordered you to do, you feel you are not responsible for your actions, furthermore your decision making does not happen at the site, but from a huge distance, further insulating yourself against your actions.
I wondered why Britain refused to lift a finger to help the Saharawis (Western Sahara dispute), even though the ministers and officials concerned were decent people (most of them, anyway). I knew them, some of them were my friends. They would stop to save an injured child on the street. But transport that child to the realm of “foreign policy” and she is ignored, rendered irrelevant, inconvenient to the dominating calculus of what matters to states, not people.
…it is the perpetuation of the existing way of doing things, not anarchism, that may pose the greater risk to our peace and security. It is the alienation of government from people, and us from each other, that more endangers our fragile stability.
Unfortunately, Ross, does not possess much understanding of economics:
…likewise, capitalism offers the great deception that thanks to its machinations everyone will be richer in the future, thus justifying gross inequality and humiliation today.
Communism offered a spurious equality at the sacrifice of individual liberty. Capitalism offers liberty at the expense of social justice, harmony and that essential sense of individual or shared meaning.