You’ve posted this complaint before. In fact, I think I responded the same way. But here it goes again -
Regarding the forum hurting the reputation of Mises.org: Leave that to the moderators to sort out.
Regarding cries for censorship: That was a long time ago (in internet time). There is now a Member’s Issues forum, and you were never censored. In fact, you were defended. Lilburne took the time to debate you in an effort to demonstrate to the forum how to maintain civility in a debate.
Regarding gaining potential converts to AE: Nobody here that I am aware of is trying to gain converts to AE. AE is not something one converts to. Nobody converted me. I was thrown up against the wall by the collapse of Lehman Brothers in Sept. 2008. I made my own conclusions about which scientific method better explains the real world.
Also, it would take a rather childish person to read posts on a forum and then make conclusions one way or another about AE.
Have you read Sieben’s debate on that other website?
Have you read AdrianHealey’s debate?
Have you followed Esuric’s and Neoclassical’s discussions?
Those are examples of debates / discussions that are constructive. Filc has made a recent attempt to debate with you, Samarami threw in his two cents which you promptly threw out the window, and I monitor this thread because it teaches a person how NOT to debate.
The reputation of Mises.org will survive just fine.