Start a new thread, and bring more than Wikipedia, or don’t waste my time please.
Rothbard is a squishy libertarian, statist in disguise.
Can you be a libertarian and hold pro-state views, yes or no? If yes, then what is the definition of a libertarian? Do you not agree that aggression is the divining line? Or is it just strangeloopian “sometimes I gotta aggress” sort of laissez-faire ethics?
~Liberty Student