Non-sequitur.
Not so. Hit the books again.
Not much, I’m afraid.
Can you please elaborate on how White and Selgin destroyed Rothbard’s The Myth of Free Banking In Scotland ?
I’m not sure you undersad what a ‘Non-sequitur’ is.
Uh, yes it was. Have you read any of the literature regarding free banking in Scotland? It seems like you’re trolling.
Sure, you can read if for yourself.
Sure I do. That’s why I called out z12345 on it.
Right now, it is becoming clear that your entire argument is based on blind faith in authority.
There is nothing in that paper that addresses The Myth of Free Banking In Scotland , let alone destroys any of the arguments in it.
You can’t be serious.
Actually, I’m very serious and I’m calling your bluff right now on this issue. Providing “a source” is your pathetic attempt at persuasion by deception. Like the above “you can’t be serious” and that’s it. As pointed out already, that source is totally irrelevant. There is nothing in it that addresses The Myth of Free Banking In Scotland